Aberdeen: The question is how the ECB will frame its interest rate hike

Aberdeen: The question is how the ECB will frame its interest rate hike

Rente ECB
shutterstock_699491065

Felix Feather, Economist at Aberdeen, comments on this Thursday’s ECB meeting:

'The ECB looks set to hike rates by 25bps to 2.25% this week. But there remains some uncertainty as to how it will frame this decision.

That’s partly because there is potential for peace talks between the US and Iran, or lack thereof, to shift the macroeconomic outlook ahead of the meeting. And it is also because there is still some uncertainty over the ECB’s reaction function, so this week’s meeting could well be one where markets are more sensitive than usual to forecast updates, the contents of the Monetary Policy Statement, and the tone Christine Lagarde strikes.

The chance of the hike being framed in a somewhat dovish way is perhaps a little underrated.

We know the ECB will almost certainly be issued without guidance for further hiking. The clearest indication of further tightening we are likely to get is Lagarde confirming that the Governing Council holds an implicit hiking bias. That could be read as surprisingly noncommittal by markets, which are pricing in two additional rate hikes further to this week’s over the next twelve months.

The most unambiguous dovish signal the ECB could send would be to frame the move as a “risk management” hike because that would imply the ECB is positioning itself at a level from which it can defend against tail risks more effectively, rather than signalling the beginning of a protracted hiking cycle.

Lagarde will probably set out some key waymarks to further tightening. These will focus more on second-round effects, especially medium-term consumer inflation expectations and wage demands, than on the energy shock itself.

And so far, inflation pressures remain concentrated in energy, with little evidence of these second‑round effects. Wage trackers and surveys continue to show scant signs of rising wage demands, which should limit pass‑through into services inflation.'